EN
RU
Its arrival marked a turn back to the human scale, to respect for materials, and to the idea that beauty and usefulness should be inseparable in everyday things.
Society felt the shock of industrial change as early as the 1840s, but only by the end of the century did clear proposals appear for how to counter it in architecture and design. Thinkers and practitioners called for the return of responsibility and joy in work, for uniting design and making, and for judging an object not by a glossy finish but by the quality of form, proportion, and durability.
Many participants were inspired by the work of William Morris, who by the 1880s had become a well-known figure and a successful entrepreneur. Morris insisted on a strong link between the maker and the object and believed that the pleasure of craft should return to both the producer and the buyer. He loved medieval culture and saw the guild model as a healthy way of producing in small workshops, where the craftsperson is responsible for the whole cycle of making.
At the same time, Morris was not against machines as such. He criticised the division of labour into small operations, which weakens the designer’s connection with the final product and deprives the object of individuality. Machines are acceptable where they help skill and do not erase the character of the material or the maker’s hand.
These exhibitions raised the status of the decorative arts, brought craft out of the shadows, and created demand for well-made objects for everyday life.
A distinctive feature of the movement was that many of its leaders had architectural training and thought in terms of a “total interior.” Designers worked broadly, from planning houses and finishing walls to furniture, lighting, textiles, and stained glass. Because of this, rooms were perceived as a single, harmonious whole.
To distance themselves from industrial standards, objects were produced in small series or made to order. Natural and noble materials were preferred: solid wood, wool and linen, glass, enamel, wrought iron, and non‑ferrous metals. Structure and texture were not hidden under heavy finishes: joints and tenons could remain visible, and ornament often repeated a structural motif.
Across the country, guilds and workshops appeared that followed Arts and Crafts principles, as well as schools where students learned pottery, weaving, embroidery, book arts, and joinery.
Over time, the ideas of Arts and Crafts moved beyond Britain and influenced other movements. Art Nouveau inherited a love of nature and ornament. The Bauhaus absorbed respect for materials and the wish to unite art, craft, and production in one educational model. Scandinavian design developed simplicity, a human scale, and a warm approach to wood and textiles. A century later these principles appear in slow design, sustainable production, and attention to the quality of hand work.
If you enjoy this project and want to see more, you can donate any amount. Your support helps me keep researching, designing, and publishing new chapters.
Support the project




















